
The DataPortability initiative announced this morning that representatives from both Facebook and Google have joined their DataPortability Workgroup. If things work out right, this could prove to be a watershed moment in the fight for user’s data rights on the web.
The DataPortability group states their philosophy as such:
“As users, our identity, photos, videos and other forms of personal data should be discoverable by, and shared between our chosen tools or vendors. We need a DHCP for Identity. A distributed File System for data. The technologies already exist, we simply need a complete reference design to put the pieces together.”
Traditionally, most websites, especially in the realm of social networking, have offered very little in terms of data portability. This means that when a user enters data, such as by adding friends or posting content, the data is locked in to the site, and thus the user is locked into the site. If he wanted to try out a different social networking site, he would have to start afresh, not being able to carry his own data with him. Data portability isn’t just about migrating data between competing websites, though, it also has countless other implications in how we access, backup, share, mashup, transform, and use data through the web.
At the dawn of an age where computer users will be storing more of their data in the internet “cloud” than on their local hard drives, the support of Facebook and Google in the DataPortability initiative could have quite a significance towards the success of the DataPortability project, as summed up well by ReadWriteWeb:
“The non-participation of Google and Facebook, two companies that hold more user data and do more with it than almost any other consumer service on the market, was the biggest stumbling block to the viability of the project. These are two of the most important companies in recent history - what’s being decided now is whether they will be walled-garden, data-horders or truly open platforms tied into a larger ecosystem of innovation with respect for user rights and sensible policies about data.”